| 翻訳と辞書 |
MRR v GR
''MRR v GR'' was an Australian court case concerning child custody arrangements, decided in the High Court of Australia on 3 December 2009 (with reasons subsequently published on 3 March 2010). It found that a Federal Magistrate purporting to make a parenting order setting out an equal time custody arrangement between two parents erred by failing to consider the "reasonable practicability" of the arrangement as required by the legislation.
==Background to the case==
The appellant and respondent were the mother and father respectively of a child, referred to as "M" in court documents.〔''Rosa & Rosa'' 〕 They had become a couple in 1991, moving into a Sydney house in 1993 and marrying in 2000.〔''MRR v GR'' 〕〔''Rosa & Rosa'' 〕 M was born in 2002.〔 In January 2007, the family moved to Mount Isa, Queensland, so that the father could take up a two-year graduate work experience position with a mining business, working as a mechanical engineer.〔
In mid-2007, the family returned to Sydney for the father to attend a graduation awards ceremony, and shortly thereafter, in August, the mother and father separated.〔 The father returned to Mount Isa, whilst the mother and M remained living in the family home in Sydney.〔
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「MRR v GR」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|